|
Post by troyluginbill on Nov 27, 2007 0:45:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by airsoftaddict on Nov 27, 2007 15:07:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by binarypunisher on Nov 27, 2007 15:21:28 GMT -5
Modern converse boots are NICE.
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Nov 27, 2007 15:46:21 GMT -5
Great find Troy. They look like they would be great footwear for airsoft skirmishing. Quite similar to the NVA Banta boots though a bit taller.
|
|
YankeeDiv26
Staff Sgt.
Frustrated Mac Owner
BDM<33
Posts: 2,462
|
Post by YankeeDiv26 on Nov 27, 2007 16:08:32 GMT -5
wow, great find Troy. Those sure look comfy for combat footwear!
|
|
Nimlas
Master sergeant
grumpy
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by Nimlas on Nov 27, 2007 17:58:30 GMT -5
Chucks>Everything
If you don't have chucks you're not cool.
But 100 bucks? Jeez.
|
|
guitarmaster
Corporal
And at this range, I'm a real Frederick Zoller
Posts: 954
|
Post by guitarmaster on Nov 27, 2007 23:06:59 GMT -5
I heard you can design your own converse at teh website. Probably be cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by airsoftaddict on Nov 28, 2007 19:58:36 GMT -5
oo I didn't notice the 100$ price tag, my chucks were only 40$
|
|
|
Post by Jager.Drü on Nov 28, 2007 20:19:53 GMT -5
Not a big fan of Chucks. I have a pair of NVA shoes that I wear all the time. I'm Vans guy myself.
|
|
|
Post by troyluginbill on Nov 28, 2007 21:22:57 GMT -5
I agree, I wouldn't pay 100.00 for sneakers. But I would for an accurate pair of repro ww2 jungle sneakers. Which is what these are even though they are "converse chucks". Originals in a size to fit me would run 300-400.00. Not something that I would want to wear in the field. But they are comfy. However a word of caution, do not wear them in November in the field. Frost toes!!!
|
|