|
MG 42?
May 23, 2007 11:37:30 GMT -5
Post by heinz on May 23, 2007 11:37:30 GMT -5
Valtteri - a few points: 1: ANGS had nothing to do with it. The gear box was designed and manufactured by Echigoya 2: Sorry, cant agree with "meticulous inner parts upgrade in a custom shop". You state that it uses an M120 and gives 1.13J of power. 1.13J is 350 FPS with a 0.2g BB. I'd expect considerably more than that off an M120 - over 400 FPS. If he said he put an M120 in it, he's having you on 3: Get shot of the 509mm inner barrel. Fit a PSG1 extended 650mm inner barrel. Think it's good with a 509? fit a 6.04 650 and it makes a lot of difference to the accuracy at range I wouldnt go any tighter for a gun thats likely to get covered in crap.
|
|
|
MG 42?
May 23, 2007 12:34:10 GMT -5
Post by valtteri on May 23, 2007 12:34:10 GMT -5
Heinz, 1. Thanks for clearing this up. Only place I could find any real information about this gun was the Arniesairsoft news about ANGS making a small batch of these. The seller told me the gun is made by SHOEI 2. I'm 100% sure the spring had M120 on it. I know the power is less than expected from that. There are many possible reasons - springs are never quite what promised, though usually into the other directions, the gearbox might handle springs differently (spring guide is a special part, also the spring cavity *might* be longer than on normal AEGs or something) and the box/feed may leak air. However for one reason or another the gun has absolutely awesome range, which far surpasses other guns with similar power. The range also feels better than it actually is, as the gun is almost always shot from a stable position in long bursts. Stability and aiming does make a great difference in airsoft, too.. About the custom shop: The gun went trough two guys doing extensive work, always resulting in bad feed & broken pistons and gears. However after sending it into this custom shop, it has worked flawlessly and seen a lot of action - in the last two games the gun had more than 10 000 bbs going through it - on both occasions. 3. I went with the 509mm barrel because I had one spare. Also, at the time I believed that 605mm barrel could only be used with a PSG-1 cylinder, which does not fit into this gun. This I have later proven false with other guns, but this MG works so well that I don't care to do anything to it till something breaks.
|
|