|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Feb 23, 2006 17:37:48 GMT -5
I am haveing feed trouble with the mag and I mostly think is becuase the way the bb's lay in the mag. Or its probally like you guys said it needs to be sanded down but were?  Its at the top of the mag but still inside where i can't see whats going on. Why can't they just make things simple?  |
|
|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Feb 24, 2006 19:42:05 GMT -5
doesn't anybody want to help me?
|
|
|
|
Post by schmitty on Feb 24, 2006 21:03:18 GMT -5
I want to help you, but not sure what advice to offer, The only problem I noticed with my M3 mag, was that if there was a gap in the stack of BB's in the mag it would often stop firing when it got to it until it was rectified. The mags are a hassle to load and you have to make sure there are no gaps in the zig-zag stack.
Schmitty
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordak on Feb 24, 2006 23:05:01 GMT -5
yeah, the double stack has got to be perfect.
if you did that,
the casting of the mag wall is shoddy, the bbs get stuck...
i guess fine sand paper would help,
I noticed it doesnt happen on the new heavy weight version..
BB types can make a difference too. Soft bbs are worse, belive it or not, lighter weight bbs are usually harder.
-Gordak
|
|
|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Feb 25, 2006 14:58:31 GMT -5
Thanks guys. I also have another question. I heard somewhere that mac11 mags are compadable with the greaser is that true?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gordak on Feb 25, 2006 21:25:30 GMT -5
LOL no
|
|
|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Feb 26, 2006 14:12:43 GMT -5
ok thanks again
|
|
|
|
Post by Gangsta on Feb 27, 2006 17:29:51 GMT -5
My greaser mag catch has trouble keeping the mag in what should i do?
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant 
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Feb 28, 2006 15:59:31 GMT -5
Generally I found the real problem with Greaser mags was getting them in and out. The fit typically was too tight out of the box and the mag well on the Hudsons had to be sanded or filed a bit. I had to do that with both of my Hudson GBB guns. Perhaps someone was too dilligent in this effort? Perhaps a single strip of tape on the magazine(s) to remedy this?
|
|
|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Feb 28, 2006 21:33:43 GMT -5
like duck tape?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rainer Schmidt on Feb 28, 2006 22:44:04 GMT -5
I've always used electrical tape for my needs, it is easily removed if too much is on, where as duck tape can be a real big pain in the ass on some materials.
|
|
|
|
Post by 101st all the way! on Mar 1, 2006 17:19:42 GMT -5
true dat.
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Mar 3, 2006 2:53:38 GMT -5
Electrical tape is best for such things. (Smoother, thinner and leaves less residue when removed)
|
|
|
|
Post by no time to log in on Mar 20, 2006 18:05:56 GMT -5
what kind of file should i use for the mag?
|
|
Its at the top of the mag but still inside where i can't see whats going on. Why can't they just make things simple? 
