|
Post by blitz on Aug 11, 2008 16:11:29 GMT -5
Spread the word..........vote for WWII guns. Can't let the "not interested in WWII" remain on the top! Edit- Link didn't work, here it is: www.airsoftnews.eu/news.php
|
|
TommyGunner
Staff Sgt.
Hackjob Mauro
1st Marine Division, 1942
Posts: 2,265
|
Post by TommyGunner on Aug 11, 2008 16:13:58 GMT -5
what? Im not following this. What is this about?
TommyGunner
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 11, 2008 17:43:26 GMT -5
Fixed now.
|
|
|
Post by mischief on Aug 11, 2008 17:51:25 GMT -5
Its a vote on what kind of replica you'd like to see next. One of the choices is "not interested in WWII" stuff like that.
As of my vote the PPSH-41 is ahead of the "not interested" crowd.
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 11, 2008 18:32:28 GMT -5
Although the manufacturers probably won't see this, it is good to show the rest of the airsoft community that we need more World War 2/ historical guns instead of the thousands of modern weapon variations.
|
|
|
Post by mischief on Aug 11, 2008 18:59:11 GMT -5
Agreed! But the problem is all the little newbs just starting out want to be just like the guys doing it for real. Thats why every new company that comes out starts with the basic three(ak/mp5/m4) and build from there. Its only after they made alittle cash that they start to branch out into other rep's. But even then its the bigger ticketed items like SAW's.
But just keep at it and keep growing this side of airsoft and with more coverage in magazines and the bigger events(like anything that John Lu puts on) then they will start making more.
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 11, 2008 19:20:17 GMT -5
My first gun was the Well R6, and after 1 day it broke. Then I saw the CYMA Thompson and loved it. I guess its me being a history buff and liking airsoft combined. Really, when it comes to airsoft, WW2 guns really don't have a disadvantage. That it is except, cost.
|
|
|
Post by bluecrabofpain on Aug 11, 2008 20:22:45 GMT -5
The PTRS anti-tank rifle wasn't on the list, how disappointing I see nothing wrong in making a new, proprietary 14.5 mm bb or anything....
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 11, 2008 20:40:51 GMT -5
;D That wouldn't hurt at all!
|
|
|
Post by Garrick Udet on Aug 12, 2008 13:00:40 GMT -5
If you're a tank
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 12, 2008 13:35:24 GMT -5
If it were that size, you could make them bullet shaped for increased speed!
|
|
|
Post by mischief on Aug 12, 2008 17:39:50 GMT -5
you guys scare me somtimes
|
|
|
Post by bluecrabofpain on Aug 14, 2008 9:57:34 GMT -5
The PPSH now leads the "not interested" by about 34 votes. w00t.
BTW, why is the RPD on the list? it really wasn't a WWII gun, even if it did exist in 1944.
|
|
|
Post by m5a11943 on Aug 15, 2008 7:21:53 GMT -5
Where is this VOTE taking place at! I want to put in my vote.
|
|
|
Post by blitz on Aug 15, 2008 9:03:46 GMT -5
|
|
Retrohead
Private
Previously 29thletsgo
Posts: 194
|
Post by Retrohead on Aug 15, 2008 17:31:02 GMT -5
Where is this VOTE taking place at! I want to put in my vote. The pole should be on the far right side
|
|
|
Post by squirrelcat on Jan 4, 2010 8:59:36 GMT -5
Yeah it should be
|
|
kalbs
Master sergeant
Posts: 1,142
|
Post by kalbs on Jan 11, 2010 5:02:56 GMT -5
Old news. Thread closed
|
|