|
Post by mauser98k on Jul 3, 2006 16:37:42 GMT -5
What kind of weapons did the germans take from the allies, and would it be dumb to buy a gun as a "capture". I need to know because a lot of the fields by my place don't allow kar 98's.
|
|
|
Post by smokeythebear on Jul 3, 2006 16:41:06 GMT -5
well I dont think it would really matter just any gun they could grab. off topic did the germans take american 1911's like the americans did with the luger?
|
|
Nimlas
Master sergeant
grumpy
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by Nimlas on Jul 3, 2006 16:55:03 GMT -5
Well yes I think it would matter.From what I understand Krauts liked M1 Carbines alot. I've seen it in my photos. As I beleive Zak said they shyed away from the Garands as it took some skill and training to reload.
|
|
|
Post by Capt. Zak on Jul 3, 2006 23:17:44 GMT -5
They loved the M1 CArbine. They also took a liking to the Ppsh-41 on the Eastern Front.
|
|
|
Post by jardows on Aug 15, 2006 18:10:13 GMT -5
As well as the SVT-40. In fact, it was the use of captured SVT-40's that inspired the G43.
|
|
|
Post by mauser98k on Aug 15, 2006 20:06:50 GMT -5
I thought they were inspired from the garand to make the g41-g43
|
|
YankeeDiv26
Staff Sgt.
Frustrated Mac Owner
BDM<33
Posts: 2,462
|
Post by YankeeDiv26 on Aug 16, 2006 15:03:02 GMT -5
i wouldnt get why they loved the carbine. it was a good weapon for rear eschelon but they probably would be the last ones to get it so to me it doesnt make much sense why the germans would like an underpowered carbine. hey mauser where did you get your logo, if you made it yourself then u are god
|
|
Nimlas
Master sergeant
grumpy
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by Nimlas on Aug 16, 2006 15:42:37 GMT -5
Underpowered? I think not. If you actually do all the math, the round is much more powerful than a .357 Magnum round, so all this crap about soldiers not being able to put a round through a Chinese Parka in Korea is BS.It is just an excusemade up by those guys who couldn't shoot for sh*t.
And yes, Dakota is a God, and my personal Photoshop Monkey!
|
|
|
Post by mauser98k on Aug 16, 2006 23:56:58 GMT -5
hint hint m1 thumb
|
|
|
Post by spitfire740 on Aug 16, 2006 23:57:51 GMT -5
Italians could have used the thompson . I can say Sam Giancana sent a "Chicago type-writer" to me, and that I'm his long lost cousin.
|
|
|
Post by waffenman1945 on Sept 13, 2006 20:15:54 GMT -5
yes ive seen pics with all kinds of allies weapons......i would wouldt u
|
|
|
Post by neillblume on Jan 6, 2007 12:33:28 GMT -5
ive seen pics of americans with mp40s apparently the germans loved the thompson for its rate of fire and reliability and the americans loved the mp40 for its accuracy and reliability. The germans started the war with k98 a vgery good rifle but because of the way their tactics worked the average infantryman did not require so much firepower. that is the theory of course. Someone said that the garand was the rifle of the war except for the ping as it ran out of ammo, informing your enemy you were defenseless. In truth there are some pics i ve seen of single infantrymen with like three differnt guns! k98 + m40, or k43 and mp44
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jan 6, 2007 13:42:50 GMT -5
I would advise against using 'captured weapons', it wasn't exactly the norm, that is unless you're portraying a German on the E. Front ; many PPSH41s were used. I'm not saying that this wasn't practiced elsewhere ; Mark Bando came out with a book a while back about D-day and in almost half of the pictures of the paratroopers they had captured weapons....however the situation called for it. I think if you have a German impression you should have a German weapon...try to get one of the new MP40 AEGs, or perhaps get into classic airsoft. Cheers Thomas
|
|
|
Post by CharleyNovember on Jan 6, 2007 13:49:51 GMT -5
If these China made MP40's remain reliable then there is really no reason not to have a German weapon. and hopefully there will be a China made K98 soon so that the loadouts will be more authentic instead of every German airsofter running around with a MP40
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Jan 6, 2007 15:26:10 GMT -5
I think we're on the cusp of things finally breaking wide open. At the Long Winter coming up they're expecting probably 50 players and all will have very decent impressions, there will be lots of props and probably over a third of the players will have period correct looking weapons.
I can't wait.
|
|
|
Post by mauser98k on Jan 8, 2007 18:52:39 GMT -5
Holy cow, this thread has been going for a LONG time. :\
|
|
|
Post by lando on Jan 13, 2007 15:33:11 GMT -5
Nimlas: No, the M1 carbine's round being underpowered is not crap. Untill you have been-there-done-that you cant have a say. How many people have you shot and dropped with the Carbine? It's the same with the M4 and the 5.56mm, everyone says it's more than enough to knock someone down and keep 'em there, except for the people that actually do the shooting! Try watching a Dirka running away 200 meters into a house after taking eight 5.56mm rounds. Listen to the people that do the shooting, not the ones doing the calculations.
|
|
Nimlas
Master sergeant
grumpy
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by Nimlas on Jan 13, 2007 15:52:15 GMT -5
How many people have you shot and dropped with the Carbine?
|
|
guitarmaster
Corporal
And at this range, I'm a real Frederick Zoller
Posts: 954
|
Post by guitarmaster on Jan 13, 2007 23:21:41 GMT -5
|
|
napalm
Private
Government Issue Groundpounder
Posts: 124
|
Post by napalm on Jan 13, 2007 23:28:25 GMT -5
I can confirm that he's 10th Mountain... used to play here in STL before joining up... he's in the same Battalion as one of my good friends from high school.
|
|
|
Post by phantom12321 on Jan 14, 2007 10:21:52 GMT -5
Why would your field restrict K98's? Is the FPS too high?
|
|
napalm
Private
Government Issue Groundpounder
Posts: 124
|
Post by napalm on Jan 14, 2007 13:24:24 GMT -5
The K98s have the potential to shoot over 500 FPS. I remember when I had mine I used green gas in it and it shot 530... of course this was in the summer. Most fields (at least ours) do not let weapons shoot over 500 FPS.
|
|
Nimlas
Master sergeant
grumpy
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by Nimlas on Jan 14, 2007 19:01:33 GMT -5
I can confirm that he's 10th Mountain... used to play here in STL before joining up... he's in the same Battalion as one of my good friends from high school. Ok, he can't be using an M1 carbine? Can he?
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Jan 14, 2007 19:21:15 GMT -5
There are always debates and disagreements about the potency of some weapons vs another. The M1 carbine wasn't the cow dropper the M1 garand was not is the .223 M4 as potent as an M14 or AK 7.62. But guess what. They both are more then capable of getting the job done and none of them would be fun to get hit by. In WW2 a lot of troops complained about the lack of stopping power with the carbine (especially at range) Alot of GI compained about alot of things. Some had merit and some didn't. I'm sure in many of the cases sited the GI wasn't actually hitting his target.
A friend of mine Sgt Kenn Miller came upon a NVA soldier on a trail. They were within 10 feet of each other. Both emptied mags in the others direction and ran away. neiher scored a hit. You have to understand that Kenn is an excellent shot and one of the finest warriors I know. People often blame weapons where skill or anxiety was at fault. Kenn of course will admit that. A carbine round will effect a person if it hits them. The idea of rounds bouncing off Chicom jackets is hooey. It doesn't have the effect of a Springfield or Garand. Getting back to the original thread the carbine was a popular weapon with the germans who even gave the weapon a wermacht designation
|
|
chadwick
Private
91st infantry division, PFC Chadwick
Posts: 109
|
Post by chadwick on Jan 25, 2007 22:21:55 GMT -5
actualy, my grandfathers favorite weapon he used was the M1 carbine. he never had a problem taking down an enemy. he prefered it to the M1 garand. the m4 scientificaly being a small round, has more speed than the .30 cal rifle, but has a terrible shock effect.
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Jan 26, 2007 3:14:21 GMT -5
Lando is in fact in Iraq currently and was due back originally in January. Then delayed to February now delayed further till March. In Vietnam, guys counted the days and even the hours until they got to come home. Your ticket home day was exactly 365 days from arrival in country and that date was pretty much carved in granite. If the army prolonged that date on the freedom bird to the average trooper, there would have been a mutiny. These young men and woman serving in todays military are amazing. My hat is off to them all.
Debates about stopping power and the virtues of individual weapons are never ending. There were pluses and minuses with every weapon, in every armies inventory. The original thread of course was about captured weapons and that's probably where it should stay. Let's hope in the coming years we'll have enough viable and affordable choices to carry on the debate about who should be carrying what. I know Leland will be carrying an AEG Garand when he gets back! Hooah!
|
|
TommyGunner
Staff Sgt.
Hackjob Mauro
1st Marine Division, 1942
Posts: 2,265
|
Post by TommyGunner on Jan 26, 2007 18:26:22 GMT -5
I can not personally say that the carbine was underpowered or not, but Joe Levato who was a USMC in WW2 and a personal friend of mine, can say how powerfull the gun was and he says it was not too powerfull.
He disliked the Carbine, he was forced to use it several times when he ran out of ammo for his Garand and it was really hard to stop a Jap in his tracks with it. Plain and simple it would take too many rounds to drop one if he was charging you. (Remeber this is what I was told by a man who used the gun on Sipan and elsewhere)
quote from Joe Levato " A Jap whos been shot but can still shoot is just as bad as one that hasnt and unless you drop him right then and there your dead"
Hence why the Carbine among the Marines was not liked all that much you had a hard time stoping a Jap on the first shot.
Im also not saying its any easier to stop a Jap on the first shot with any gun either, my position is neutral, if I decide to do an impression that requires a Carbine Ill do it simply becuase they did it and no matter how bad you gripped or groaned about it you still had to get the job done with what you got issued.
Hard hitting or not at least they had something to shoot with.
TommyGunner
|
|
|
Post by hinka on Apr 18, 2007 4:42:00 GMT -5
on the carbine issue,
i was a replacement for handguns/smgs for rear area troops, and light infantry
its a lot more accurate than a 1911, (ive fired both here in england b4 the pistol ban)
but you loose power it dosnt stop as well as .45.
the trade off is range, 150-200m carbine, 30-50m 1911
you get (in theroy) more range to stop the target than with a pistol.
to compare with the garand in not practical. the garand and m1 carbine are totally different weapons for different jobs.
|
|
2nd Bat
Master sergeant
Posts: 11,813
|
Post by 2nd Bat on Apr 19, 2007 0:57:57 GMT -5
Whatever the reasons the Germans loved them of all the captured US weapons it was their favorite. The US GIs liked grabbing Lugers and P38s and often grabbed MP40s. At this point in WW2 airsoft we should feel fortunate if half ourt players have a period correct airsoft weapon regardless which side the weapon is from.
|
|
|